EQUIPMENT FINANCING LAWYER
For transaction financing - legal matters, contact our law firm at 403-400-4092 / 905-616-8864 or Chris@NeufeldLegal.com
Transactions : Acquisitions - Vendor-Take-Back - Corporate Buy-Out - Equipment Financing
Equipment financing is a strategic financial mechanism that allows businesses to acquire essential tangible assets (ranging from heavy machinery and medical devices to IT infrastructure) without the immediate burden of a large capital outlay. This is primarily achieved through two distinct structures: equipment loans and equipment leases. From a foundational perspective, financing serves as a bridge between a company’s operational needs and its available liquidity, enabling growth by spreading the cost of an asset over its useful life. Legally and operationally, the choice between a loan or a lease defines the ownership status of the equipment, the tax treatment of payments, and the specific rights held by both the financier and the user (the equipment lessee).
For the equipment lessee, the primary motivation is the preservation of working capital and the maintenance of a healthy debt-to-equity ratio. By opting for financing rather than a cash purchase, businesses can keep their lines of credit open for emergencies or other strategic investments while benefiting from the immediate use of the asset. In a loan scenario, the business enterprise gains immediate legal ownership, which allows them to claim Capital Cost Allowance and interest deductions for tax purposes. Conversely, in a lease (particularly an operating lease), the equipment lessee acts more like a long-term renter, often enjoying lower monthly payments and the flexibility to upgrade equipment before it becomes technologically obsolete.
From the perspective of the financier, such as a bank, credit union, or independent leasing company, equipment financing is an exercise in secured risk management. The financier’s primary concern is ensuring that the value of the underlying asset remains sufficient to cover the outstanding debt in the event of a default. To mitigate risk, financiers conduct rigorous credit assessments, evaluating the corporate borrower’s cash flow, debt service coverage ratio, and the projected "tangible benefit" the equipment will bring to the business. Many financiers also leverage federal support programs, such as the Canada Small Business Financing Program, where the federal government guarantees a portion of the loan to encourage lending to higher-risk or smaller enterprises.
The legal backbone of these transactions is the Personal Property Security Act (PPSA), which governs how security interests in personal property are created and enforced. When a financier provides funds, they must attach and perfect their security interest by registering a financing statement in the provincial PPSR. This public registration acts as a legal notice to the world that the financier has a claim to the equipment, establishing a priority ranking against other potential creditors. For the equipment lessee, the PPSA provides a structured framework that prevents the financier from seizing assets without following due process, ensuring a degree of protection and transparency in the event of financial distress.
A critical legal nuance in Canadian equipment finance is the Purchase-Money Security Interest (PMSI), which grants a financier super-priority over other creditors. If a financier provides the specific funds used to acquire a new piece of equipment and registers their interest within the strict timelines dictated by the PPSA, their claim to that specific asset takes precedence even over prior lenders who hold a general security agreement on all the company's assets. For the financier, securing a PMSI is vital for protecting their investment against a borrower’s existing debt obligations. For the seeker, understanding the PMSI is important because it explains why lenders are often willing to provide 100% financing for a specific machine even if the company’s overall balance sheet is heavily leveraged.
Finally, the conclusion of the financing term brings distinct legal and financial outcomes depending on the original agreement's structure. In a standard equipment loan, the financier's lien is discharged once the final payment is made, and the borrower retains full, unencumbered title to the asset. In leasing arrangements, the parties must navigate "end-of-term" options, which may include returning the equipment, renewing the lease, or exercising a "bargain purchase option" to buy the asset for a predetermined price (often as low as $1). These transitions require careful documentation to ensure that title is properly transferred or that the financier's PPSA registration is officially amended or discharged, marking the formal end of the legal relationship between the two parties.
When your business is undertaking corporate transactions, which invariably require financing and in turn knowledgeable legal representation, contact our law firm to schedule a confidential consultation at 403-400-4092 [Alberta]; 905-616-8864 [Ontario]; or Chris@NeufeldLegal.com.
IMPORTANT NOTE: This website is designed for general informational purposes. The site is not designed to answer specific questions about your individual situation or entitlement. Do not rely upon the information provided on this website as legal advice in respect of your individual situation nor use it as substitute for individual legal advice. If you want specific legal advice, you need to engage a lawyer under established legal engagement procedures that have been specifically agreed to by that lawyer.